European Communication Research and Education Association
East European Film Bulletin
Proposals: November 15, 2020
Papers due: March 1, 2021
Romanian cinema is at the forefront of addressing the challenges that the country faces today, often linking troublesome memories to urban spaces. Recent films such as Radu Jude’s I Do Not Care If We Go Down In History as Barbarians and Cristi Puiu’s Sieranevada address collective processes of remembering by linking them to physical places - public as well as private -, thereby exemplifying the way in which memory is dependent on and projected onto the locus of the city. Media artists, such as Mona Vatamanu and Florin Tudor, have also explored the topographies of memory. At the crossroads of the country’s past and future, architecture is a powerful force for cinematic storytelling, displaying a feeling of “restorative nostalgia” (Svetlana Boym) as well as a desire for change.
As part of its Romanian focus 2021, the East European Film Bulletin is preparing a special issue on the topic of architecture and memory in Romanian cinema, television, video art and experimental film. We are looking for contributions that examine and analyse the diverse relationships between cinema, architecture and memory and their links with Romania’s complex memory, both remote and recent.
We are particularly interested in essays concerning the following topics:
1) Ruins as places of memory
2) Spaces of religious revival (folk, new age, neo-Orthodox)
3) Mall films and/or suburbia
4) Topographies of memories in alternative cinema and video art
5) Urban planning, democratic transition and its possible criticism
6) Romania’s Belle Epoque
7) Memory places: spaces which commemorate historical catastrophes (Romania’sparticipation in the destruction of European Jews; slavery; child gulags)
Proposals of 250 words should be sent to editors@eefb.org by November 15th 2020.
Edited collection
Deadline for submissions: November 1, 2020
full name / name of organization: Georgia Aitaki / Örebro University
contact email: georgia.aitaki@oru.se
Debate around ‘woke television’ has been increasingly more present in popular parlance. Within television criticism, there has been heavy reflecting on (and co-constructing of) a meta-genre of contemporary US television characterized by a particular sensitization to issues of social justice, racial justice, and gender equity and a showcasing of commitment toward denouncing institutional ideologies such as structural poverty, white supremacy, and patriarchy. Indeed, a swell of popular criticism has been quick to discern the micro-contexts of politically alert television fiction, discussing for instance African-American history and white privilege in Atlanta and Dear White People, diversity in Star Trek, progressive reimaginings of classic shows such as Buffy and Charmed, the gender-swap in Doctor Who, LGBTQ pedagogy in the revival of Will & Grace, multidimensional female characters in Glow, complex and unapologetic teen sexuality in Normal People, Big Mouth and Sex Education. These instances inform the notion of “woke television” as the inclusion of relevant and topical themes, blatantly calling out structural inequalities and delivering cultural texts that reify the pleasures and intricacies of ‘woke culture.’
Apart from celebrating contemporary television’s bold engagement with social, racial and gender-related issues, popular critical writing has simultaneously questioned the transformative and empowering implications of woke television, recognizing issues such as the ideological ambiguity of feminist shows (including the impossible-to-ignore whiteness of critically acclaimed The Handmaid’s Tale and the poshness of Fleabag), as well as the problematic representational strategies of gendered violence and rape (for example, in 13 Reasons Why). Concurrently, the popular press has engaged in debates that challenge the legacy of some of television’s most revered cultural monuments, by exposing for example the problematic layers of shows such as Friends and Sex and the City. Criticisms of this kind discuss ‘wokeness’ not only within today’s cultural zeitgeist, but also as a rejuvenating source for contemporary television criticism, thus revealing a climate of close monitoring of television production and heightened expectations from entertainment—and one that specifically invites viewers to position themselves with regard to that wokeness.
‘Wokeness’ is not only addressed as a textual feature of contemporary television but also as part of particular production logic seeking to accommodate audiences in the Trump, BLM, and post-#MeToo era; as such, it genuflects to their needs for more complex takes on everyday realities and experiences, ones that are not exclusively tainted by the requirements of the ‘majority white’ viewers. Industrial perspectives, including Netflix’s commitment to inclusion and diversity and BBC’s strategy of “repurposing” classic novels to cater to contemporary television audiences, reveal a commitment to discussing and advancing social change within the industry itself. However, audiences’ reactions have been ambivalent: ranging from discovering newfound pleasures to complaining about how contemporary television reeks of didacticism and political correctness.
As little attention has been directed toward the concept of woke television within academia, Woke TV aims to gather contributions that further explore how expressions of woke culture translate into the world of television narrative and representation, but also in dimensions of production and reception. This collection is primarily interested in navigating the context of US television; however, studies based on other national/cultural contexts will also be considered. We seek to engage with the following lines of inquiry: (a) industry perspectives, (b) textual (representational/discursive) approaches, (c) issues of audience reception, as well as (d) issues of critical reception. Possible topics include, but are not limited to, the following:
Deadline for proposals: November 1, 2020
Notification of acceptance: November 15, 2020
Deadline for first drafts: February 15, 2021
How to Submit Your Proposal:
Please submit one-page abstracts/proposals to either Georgia Aitaki (georgia.aitaki@oru.se) or Lauren J. DeCarvalho (Lauren.DeCarvalho@du.edu) by November 1, 2020 and be sure to include both a tentative title and short biographical note.
About the Editors:
Georgia Aitaki is a Senior Lecturer in Media and Communication at Örebro University, Sweden.
Lauren J. DeCarvalho is an Assistant Professor in the Department of Media, Film and Journalism Studies at the University of Denver, USA.
Gender, Work and Organisation
Deadline: February 15, 2020
Guest Editors:
This Special Issue encourages academic debate around how social and gendered inequalities exacerbate under times of bio-political and socio-economic crises—such as the COVID-19 pandemic— in an increasingly globalized and transnational world. Exploring interconnections between feminist philosophy, art and activism, we call for a wide range of methodologically disruptive papers, which preferably (though not exclusively) critically analyze diverse gendered experiences in light of intersectional and transnational feminist perspectives on inter-connectedness, relationality and care (e.g., Butler, 2004; Ettinger, 2006; Holvino, 2010; Federici, 2012; Fotaki & Harding, 2017).
The pandemic has called into question certain key premises of the neoliberal ideology—including individualism and the ability for market mechanism to maintain economic fairness—while accentuating issues of gendered power relations, intersectionality, diversity, and inclusion, among others. Nascent COVID-19 research documents disproportionate risks and worsening prospects for women, socially and economically vulnerable populations of the Global South (Wenham et al., 2020; Prasad, 2020; Wasdani & Prasad, 2020) as well as increased instances of feminicide, sexism and racism.
By dramatically reiterating how vulnerabilities are socially recreated and unequally distributed across different bodies situated at varying intersections of race, gender, ethnicity and class in a transnational neoliberal world (hooks, 1984; Apaddurai, 1995) of serial socio-economic crises, COVID-19 has sparked new and pre-existing solidarity initiatives reminding us of the unavoidable conditions of interdependence that sustain human bodies (Fotaki, 2019; Fotaki et al., 2020). Notably, attesting to their political potential to create a free space, where marginalized, transnational identities can be expressed for desired social transformation to be imagined and endeavoured (Fernandes, 2013; Li & Prasad, 2018), artistic and activist initiatives continue to lead efforts to bond different bodies together against neoliberal patriarchies (Mendes, 2020), even under social isolation (Mandalaki & Daou, 2020). Such initiatives propose new forms of knowledge, relationality and resistance, which promise to create possibilities for re-centering care, inclusion of difference and solidarity as foundations of our society.
Thus, COVID-19 presents us with a timely opportunity: to reconceptualize the possible forms of relationality that vitally encompass social life and to understand how these can reframe the paramountcy of individualism that proliferates under the neoliberal order (Fotaki & Prasad, 2015), thereby creating new and perpetuating old forms of inequalities and global poverty (Shiva & Mies, 2014). Underscoring this need, this Special Issue invites a wide range of theoretically informed contributions critically discussing these issues, especially those with a non-conventional format, inspired by art, activism, feminist thought and/or feminist forms of doing and writing research (Fotaki et al., 2014; Prasad, 2016; Pullen et al., 2020). Specifically, we invite poetic accounts (van Amsterdam & van Eck, 2019), short essays/prose, manifestos, activism (Alakavuklar, 2020), reflective accounts of (post)quarantine (Plotnikof et al., 2020), embodied (auto)ethnographies (Prasad, 2014; van Amsterdam, 2015; Mandalaki, 2019), dialogical/multi-voice accounts (Ahonen et al., 2020; MeldgaardKjaer & van Amsterdam, 2020) and arts-based research (e.g., Biehl-Missal, 2015, Ward & Shortt, 2020) engaging with photography, drawing, collage, performance, film/drama, video, dance and others. By encouraging multi-disciplinary connections between feminist philosophy, art and activism, we acknowledge the political capacity of genre-blending, non-traditional methodologies, to create an inclusive space, where different voices can be expressed and heard, to catalyze global debate over the power structures that sustain social inequalities. This promises to enliven organization studies by reconnecting it to situated human experiences of othering in a globalized, neoliberal world and to identify possibilities for social and political transformation. We welcome papers that explore, but are not limited to:
Submission Instructions
Submissions should be made electronically through the Scholar One submission system: https://mc.manuscriptcentral.com/gwo.
Please refer to the Author Guidelines at https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/page/journal/14680432/homepage/forauthors.html prior to submission.
Please select the ‘Special Issue’ article type on submission and select the relevant Special Issue title from the dropdown list where prompted.
For questions about the submission system please contact the Editorial Office at gwooffice@wiley.com
For enquiries about the scope of the Special Issue and article suitability, please contact the Emmanouela Mandalaki (emmanouela.mandalaki@neoma-bs.fr) directly.
Deadline for submissions: 15 February 2021
Deadline: October 10, 2020
Please send your
1) name, affiliation & contact info
2) 100-word bio
3) Chapter title
4) 600-800-word abstract plus references to: miazhevichg@cardiff.ac.uk
Race and ethnicity as social categories and concepts continue to generate critical perceptions of differences that ultimately define who we are in local, national and international settings. We are looking for academic essays that provide an in-depth look at issues of race, ethnicity and communications from the Eastern European, Russian and East Asian perspectives. Contributions will not only identify the malaise of our times with regard to the topics of race and ethnicity, but will also provide a bridge to understanding our historical and political pasts that affect our present and will continue to have an impact on our future. Potential approaches could be built on, but not limited to, the following areas:
Traditional/Digital/Alternative Media
Structural issues of mass media
Content of mass media:
- The coverage of ethnic/racial candidates during elections - Media outreach and advertising campaigns by ethnic/racial candidates during elections - Political comparisons of individuals, politicians, and/or campaigns of ethnic/racial vis-à-vis “dominant/majority society” individuals, politicians, and/or campaigns
- The coverage of ethnic/racial candidates during elections
- Media outreach and advertising campaigns by ethnic/racial candidates during elections
- Political comparisons of individuals, politicians, and/or campaigns of ethnic/racial vis-à-vis “dominant/majority society” individuals, politicians, and/or campaigns
--Newspaper (national, regional, local) coverage of ethnic/racial individuals, events, stories related to: culture, science, sports, crime, environment, climate change, natural disasters - - Television (national, regional, local) coverage of ethnic racial individuals, events, stories related to: culture, science, sports, crime, environment, climate change, natural disasters -Online (national, regional, local) coverage of ethnic/racial individuals, events, stories related to: culture, science, sports, crime, environment, climate change, natural disasters.
--Newspaper (national, regional, local) coverage of ethnic/racial individuals, events, stories related to: culture, science, sports, crime, environment, climate change, natural disasters -
- Television (national, regional, local) coverage of ethnic racial individuals, events, stories related to: culture, science, sports, crime, environment, climate change, natural disasters
-Online (national, regional, local) coverage of ethnic/racial individuals, events, stories related to: culture, science, sports, crime, environment, climate change, natural disasters.
- Television representations, portrayals, stereotypes of ethnic/racial individuals (in drama, soap operas, crime, comedies, children’s shows, animation, etc.) - Cinematic representations, portrayals, stereotypes of ethnic/racial individuals (in crime, drama, adventure, horror, comedies, etc.) - Online (YouTube, games, social media) representations, portrayals, stereotypes of ethnic/racial individuals.
- Television representations, portrayals, stereotypes of ethnic/racial individuals (in drama, soap operas, crime, comedies, children’s shows, animation, etc.)
- Cinematic representations, portrayals, stereotypes of ethnic/racial individuals (in crime, drama, adventure, horror, comedies, etc.)
- Online (YouTube, games, social media) representations, portrayals, stereotypes of ethnic/racial individuals.
- Print, broadcast, online representations, portrayals, stereotypes of ethnic/racial individuals
- Print, broadcast, online representations, portrayals, stereotypes of ethnic/racial individuals.
Audiences/Uses of mass media:
Effects of mass media:
- knowledge - attitudes - opinions - behaviours.
- knowledge
- attitudes
- opinions
- behaviours.
Social Scientific/Critical Orientations in Non-Media Communication
Intercultural:
Organizational:
Advocacy/Resistance:
Production studies
Intersectional/Comparative Studies in Communication
Comparative:
Deadlines: First weeks of December 2020, February 2021, April 2021 and June 2021
The European Journal of Communication has the following books available for review. We publish review essays (usually of two books on a similar topic, ca. 2000-2500 words long) and book reviews (ca. 1000-1500 words long).
If interested in reviewing any of these books, please email the Book Review Editor: Vera Slavtcheva-Petkova – Vera.Slavtcheva-Petkova@liverpool.ac.uk.
Please provide your name, title and institutional affiliation as well as the date by which you can send us your review. Our next deadlines are the first weeks of December 2020, February 2021, April 2021 and June 2021.
Review Essays (of 2 books):
Book Reviews:
Flow Volume 27 Special Issue
Deadline: September 13, 2020
Over the past several months, social media platform TikTok has seen an enormous surge in users and popularity while simultaneously becoming the focus of concerns over national and digital security risks. While its users remain skewed to the teenage demographic, the app has disrupted a number of media industries and sparked cultural controversy. In the music industry, going viral on TikTok has become a prerequisite for singles hoping to chart on the Billboard Hot 100 and in television, the app has entered the streaming wars. Chinese parent company ByteDance named Kevin Mayer, formerly in charge of streaming at Disney, as CEO of TikTok in June, and Netflix recently refined its quarterly new subscribers forecast in part due to what it perceives as TikTok’s astounding growth. But TikTok is only the latest new media application to affect legacy media industries. TikTok’s rise is replicating changes ushered in to user-generated and professional video content by platforms like YouTube, Vine, and Snapchat. And as a social networking platform, TikTok offers a new avenue for grassroots activism, community formation, and builds seemingly overnight fame for its breakout stars. However, it also exists within a contested digital space, in which concerns have been raised over cultural appropriation, privacy, online toxicity, and racism.
This inaugural issue of Flow’s twenty-seventh volume, “TikTok as a Cultural Forum,” asks media scholars to consider the rise of TikTok from cultural, industrial, technological, digital, political, historical, and national lenses. This special issue raises the question of what makes TikTok unique in its rapid ascent to cultural ubiquity and aims to assess the cultural and industrial impacts of TikTok’s rise. How might the proliferation of TikTok force scholars to rethink the significance of digital identities through lenses of race, gender, and sexual orientation? In what ways does the white co-optation of choreography and language by Black creators find historical precedent in legacies of cultural appropriation, disputes over authorial credit, and discrepancies in how cultural production and audiences are valued within the media industries? How might we discuss the connections between teen and young adult mental health, TikTok community formation, and social distancing during a global health pandemic? What are the responsibilities and practices of platforms like TikTok to stand against being a host of online toxicity, white supremacy, and other extremist groups in online spaces? How is TikTok activism different from past forms of online advocacy and community organizing? How and to what extent are established media brands rethinking digital content strategies to incorporate or compete against TikTok? Possible topics include, but are by no means limited to:
To be considered for this timely issue, please submit a completed short essay of 1200-1500 words, along with at least three images (.gif or .png) or embeddable video/audio links. We will be able to embed TikTok videos into the column, so please feel free to be creative! Send your column, media files or links, and a short bio, to Maggie Steinhauer and Nathan Rossi at flowjournaleditors@gmail.com by Sunday, September 13th, 2020. The
Special Issue will be published at flowjournal.org on Tuesday, October 6, 2020.
University of Westminster - School of Media and Communication
https://www.jobs.ac.uk/…nic
Location: Harrow
Salary: £50,162 (inc. LWA) starting salary
Hours: Full Time
Contract Type: Permanent
Placed On: 1st September 2020
Closes: 21st September 2020
Job Ref: 50058912
This post is full time and permanent, working 35 hours per week
Do you have a vision for how tomorrow’s media companies will grow and thrive?
Can you teach and support international postgraduates to manage creative projects, develop media businesses and build their careers in the media and creative industries?
The University of Westminster is looking for an industry practitioner with experience of teaching or training to join our team of senior lecturers delivering a suite of three highly successful Masters programmes in media management and media business.
We are seeking candidates with professional experience in the media or creative industries and a degree in business or a relevant discipline (e.g. media and communications or social sciences). A strong network of industry contacts will be an especial advantage as providing work experience opportunities for international students is an important dimension of the role. We are particularly interested in candidates with experience or deep knowledge of any or all of the following: content and format development and production, media project management, digital production and distribution, financial, statistical or data analysis and Theories of media management or of business.
In the short term the successful candidate will support the course leaders in teaching, assessing and administering the programmes as deputy course leader. In the medium-term the post is likely to provide the opportunity to take on a course leadership role. The post also provides the opportunity for short teaching visits to China because, although delivery in 2020-21 will take place in the UK (Harrow Campus) and online, one of the programmes is usually taught partly in Beijing. While the courses are primarily concerned with media management and practice, Westminster plays a leading role in media research through the internationally-rated Communication and Media Research Institute (CAMRI). Familiarity with business or academic research is not essential but would be an advantage as staff are encouraged to pursue research interests and play an active role in relevant media management and economics research networks.
The University of Westminster is committed to supporting diversity and equal opportunities in our dealings with job applicants, students, staff and the public. We are fully committed to creating a stimulating and supportive learning and working environment based on mutual respect and trust.
For further information and to apply for this post, please click apply and you will be redirected to our website.
Closing date: midnight on 21 September 2020
Interviews are likely to be held on: week beginning 12 October 2020
Administrative contact (for queries only): Recruitment@westminster.ac.uk
Please note: We are unable to accept applications by email. All applications must be made online. CVs in isolation or incomplete application forms will not be accepted.
We are fortunate to receive a large number of applications for our vacancies. Regrettably, we are not able to provide feedback to those job applicants who are not shortlisted, as it simply would not be manageable to do so.
Embracing diversity and promoting equality.
Recerca. Revista de pensament i Anàlisi
Submission deadline: February 15, 2021
Publication: April 2022
Editors: Emma Gómez Nicolau (Universitat Jaume I) and Arantxa Grau Muñoz (Universitat de València)
Perceptions and uses of the body correspond to both cultural parameters and historical contingencies. However, many of these endeavours to socially contextualise the body are premised on the understanding of the body as a natural fact. The body-organism is presented from the legitimating position of biological facts––anatomical, endocrinological, immunological, and so on––until it becomes a self-evident entity. Our interpretations and perceptions of the body, but also our image of its composition, are mediated by the biomedical sciences as legitimate devices for producing scientific knowledge about the body.
The feminist perspective on biomedical sciences has helped to uncover how this technological device invades the social construction of the body by denoting “sex” as the fundamental criterion to explain corporeal differentiation. “Sex” is described as an attribute of the body- organism that corresponds to biological and chemical principles, any variations in which are regarded as an anomaly and/or a pathology. Sex has become a technological device designed to explain and justify corporeal differentiation by highlighting differences (organs, hormones, etc.) and ignoring similarities. This process serves as a normative matrix in the decodification of these bodies. Male and female bodies must necessarily match the bimorphism determined by the biomedical sciences, anatomy loses its descriptive purpose to become a prescriptive science, and it reaches beyond the field of biomedical intervention to invade the sphere of social identity.
This edition of Recerca. Revista de Pensament i Análisi provides a space to explore approaches from sociology, philosophy, ethics and other related disciplines that analyse experiences and processes of this western hegemonic definition of the gendered body and how it affects social experiences and identities. We are especially interested in analysis of the processes of the diverse corporeal itineraries that resist, subvert and destabilise the hegemonic biomedical paradigm, and of the processes of corporeal decodification that contravene the hegemonic definitions of the gendered body.
We propose the following topics:
No payment from authors is expected. Further information regarding Recerca and the instructions for submitting original manuscripts can be consulted at https://www.e-revistes.uji.es/…dex
Please, write enicolau@uji.es if you require any additional explanation.
University of London
Postdoctoral Research Fellow - Permanent with funding for 24 months
Project: ProDem - Protests and Democracy: How Movement Parties, Social Movements, and Active Citizens are Reshaping Europe
Department: Sociology, City, University of London
Closing Date: 20 September 2020
The Department of Sociology at City, University of London seeks to recruit a Postdoctoral Research Fellow to work alongside Dr Dan Mercea, Co-Principal Investigator on the project “ProDem - Protests and Democracy: How Movement Parties, Social Movements, and Active Citizens are Reshaping Europe”. The project aims to comparatively assess the medium and long-term effects of the triple interaction between citizens, social movements, and movement parties in 6 European countries. The position, available for two years, is funded through an award by the Volkswagen Stiftung.
Responsibilities
The key responsibilities of the role will involve assisting the principal investigator in designing a cross-national survey to be commissioned to an external pollster.
The appointed candidate will be involved in writing up the research findings together with the principal investigator and other project members, and reporting them in conference proceedings and presentations and in high-ranked academic journals.
Person Specification
The successful candidate will have, or be about to be awarded, a PhD in political science, sociology, communication studies or a related social science discipline, have a good command of advanced statistical analysis and survey design as well as an interest in civic or political participation, social movements, political parties, digital or broadcasting media, and a developing publication record.
They will be able to demonstrate knowledge of advanced statistical analysis and survey design skills, as well as a developing publication record and the ability to conduct literature reviews and relevant background research.
Full details of the responsibilities of the role and person specification can be found in the attached job description.
Additional Information: https://www.jobs.ac.uk/…ths
Deadline: October 1, 2020
Submissions for the new issue of the Interações Journal published by Instituto Superior Miguel are now open. The journal welcomes original articles that present research results and/or theoretical reflection in the different fields of Social and Human Sciences, namely Communication and Media Studies.
From an interdisciplinary editorial perspective, Interações' primary objective is to foster the reflection and diffusion of knowledge in the areas of Social and Human Sciences. The journal accepts articles of scientific investigation, reviews and critical essays, in Portuguese, English and Spanish.
Interações is ruled by the double-blind review standard, ensuring the anonymity of reviewers and authors throughout the review process. No payment from authors will be expected.
Any questions should be addressed through the email: interacoes@ismt.pt
The articles must be submitted through the website: https://www.interacoes-ismt.com/
Guidelines and other instructions for authors can be found on the journal's website: http://www.interacoes-ismt.com/…sta
SUBSCRIBE!
ECREA
Chaussée de Waterloo 1151 1180 Uccle Belgium
Who to contact
About ECREA Become a member Publications Events Contact us Log in (for members)
Help fund travel grants for young scholars who participate at ECC conferences. We accept individual and institutional donations.
DONATE!
Copyright 2017 ECREA | Privacy statement | Refunds policy